Amendment XXVIIIThe drive to amend the Constitution to allow
foreign-born citizens to run for President is picking up steam, and drawing the
attention of press outside of California.
I learned a lot from this article from the Baltimore Sun, which addresses the influence of
Schwarzenegger on both the proponents and opponents of the
amendment.
Today, a national -- if fledgling -- campaign is under way to allow foreign-born citizens to hold the United States' highest office. Supporters expect congressional hearings on the proposal this year. I was surprised to learn that a majority of Americans oppose the Amendment. Even if Schwarzenegger were to be the first beneficiary of the change (which he won't be, because we're going to hand him his ass in the 2006 gubernatorial election), I wouldn't oppose it. It's the right thing to do: why shouldn't a naturalized citizen be able to hold the highest office, if that's who people wish to serve? Given the scrutiny to which a Presidential candidate is subjected, what's the possible down side? After all, naturalized citizens can be in the succession (we have had more than one Secretary of State born outside the US), so why can't they be elected? As this issue heats up, I'll be interested to see whether Democrats rally against it. We're not people who oppose what's right in order to secure short-term political gain, so my guess is that we won't. It's worth keeping in mind that there are more than a few prominent Democrats who would eventually benefit — including the Canadian-born Governor of Michigan, Jennifer Granholm, on whom I will admit to having a small intergenerational crush. Posted: Tue - February 15, 2005 at 11:04 AM | Category: | | | |
|
Quick Links
Search
Related topics
Categories
Archives
Calendar
XML/RSS Feed
Blogroll
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category: Published On: Jul 23, 2006 02:49 PM |
||||||||||||||