Double crap: Arnold gets to raise all the money he wants


It's official; the ruling on CSC vs. FPPC has been finalized. Arnold and Citizens to Save California are now legally permitted to raise an unlimited amount of money from each donor.

For more details and analysis on some of the fine points of the court case, see our posting on the preliminary ruling ( "Crap"), which also links back to the history of the story from the beginning.

Judge tosses campaign cash limit, boosts Schwarzenegger's camp
(AP) A Superior Court judge cleared the way for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to raise unlimited cash to promote his agenda to voters, ruling Friday that the state's political watchdog improperly limited donations for ballot measures.

The ruling overturned a Fair Political Practices Commission regulation that would have restricted Schwarzenegger's efforts to raise $50 million for a package of constitutional amendments he wants to put before voters in the fall.

Schwarzenegger and political allies sued the commission earlier this month to overturn the limits on contributions to ballot measure committees controlled by a candidate. Judge Shelleyanne Chang agreed that the rule conflicted with the constitutional right to participate in the political process.

The judge noted that the rule applied only to ballot measure committees controlled by candidates and not other ballot committees, forcing candidates to either give up their interest in the ballot measure or accept a fund-raising disadvantage to opponents who can accept unlimited donations.

The FPPC was frustrated with the Sacramento County Superior Court decision, but had not decided whether to appeal, said Chairwoman Liane Randolph.

"Unlimited funds raised into ballot measure committees controlled by candidates who are otherwise subject to contribution limits leaves a gap in the system that needs to be addressed," Randolph said in a prepared statement.


I'm a little distressed that frustration is the strongest emotion that the FPPC chair can manage to muster at this point. I'm way more than a little distressed that the appeal isn't automatic. I would think it was a no-brainer: The FPPC passed the now-overturned rule presumably because they thought it was good and right to restrict ballot-initiative fundraising by candidate-controlled committees. Why would they now not appeal to the California Supreme Court to assert that they were right to do so?

More about this from other sources:
California judge ends campaign cash limit, a boost for Schwarzenegger (News 4)
Governor wins on ballot money (Bee)

Posted: Sun - March 27, 2005 at 08:36 PM   | Category:     |   |   | |



©
eXTReMe Tracker